donutsweeper: (Default)
donutsweeper ([personal profile] donutsweeper) wrote2009-10-03 03:46 pm

(no subject)

As an FYI an HD version of the pilot for "Stargate Universe" is currently free on itunes (in the US anyway, I don't know about elsewhere) just in case anyone has a burning desire to see it.

(part one and part two- or just use the itunes search engine)
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-03 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I heard the ratings sucked. Didn't realize they sucked *that* badly. :-)

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-03 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Rating are being touted as 'the best ratings for Stargate since the S2 Atlantis premiere!' 2.35 total viewers is the number I've heard. Not that great for the $1 million episode price tag!
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
1.7 are the numbers I heard. :-) Wonder what they're padding theirs with. :-)

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
2.35 million total viewers along with a 1.7 HH rating, 1.32 million Adults 25-54, and 1.12 million Adults 18-49 during its two-hour debut episode from 9-11PM (ET/PT).

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/03/syfy-continues-ratings-roll-stargate-universe-averages-2-35-million-in-premiere/29405

it's being considered a success. *rolls eyes*
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Idiots.

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
it'll be really interesting to see how the numbers stack up 3 or 4 episodes into it. A LOT of people tuned in solely because it was the premeire. But unless they were hooked they won't be randomly tuning in several weeks from now
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Yep. There will be those who will be drawn to it because they think they're supposed to be. Either because it's Stargate or because it's OMG!EDGY!, but I don't think they can support a show on their own.

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
the majority of the newspaper/blog/whatnot reviews I saw seemed to be fairly positive, but 90% of the fan ones ranged from extremely negative to *meh*. Not a good sign.
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. Not good at all.

Now, if they listen to the fans, and adjust accordingly, they can get the audience, but hey. These are the Boyz from Bridge... I doubt they could adjust anything that isn't in their shorts.

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
*snickers* Lord knows they 'knew' what was best with SGA. Because Rodney/Jennifer and Ronon/what's-her-name were *such* popular pairings!
ext_3440: (Default)

[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention the complete craphole they made of the last seasons of SG1. Cuz, y'know, they know best.

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-04 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah... let's not mention that...

[identity profile] rustydog.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
(Thank you for the fyi by the way!)

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2009-10-05 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Happy to help!