donutsweeper (
donutsweeper) wrote2013-01-21 04:21 pm
Entry tags:
Commentary tracks- love them or hate them?
So in my goal to use my LJ for more than just ficcage postings here is a rambling thinky thought post on commentary tracks on movies and tv shows, due mostly to the fact the Merlin one (which I haven't listened to, but is flooding my tumblr) has just been released.
There's a number of things about the commentary that can really add to my enjoyment of the show/movie (of the 'oh wow, I never thought about it that way' manner), but I've also had times when it's made me question things and even outright hate people. There's also the issue that once actors/directors/writers say that 'this scene is supposed to show X' it's hard to then later not see X when watching it.
I've listened to some GREAT commentary- Fight Club and Daredevil both come to mind movie-wise and for TV John Barrowman on Doctor Who's 'Empty Child' and Joe Flannigan on SGA's 'Rising' are both wonderful. But then there's some that just come off as boring or as if you're missing a joke (like SGA's "38 Minutes") and then there's the OH NO WHY DID I WATCH THIS (seriously, never watch the commentary and BTS stuff for Highlander Raven, you will never see Elizabeth Gracen in the same light again).
Thoughts, anyone?
And, btw, a hearty welcome to anyone stopping by my journal for the first time, have a donut and enjoy your stay!
There's a number of things about the commentary that can really add to my enjoyment of the show/movie (of the 'oh wow, I never thought about it that way' manner), but I've also had times when it's made me question things and even outright hate people. There's also the issue that once actors/directors/writers say that 'this scene is supposed to show X' it's hard to then later not see X when watching it.
I've listened to some GREAT commentary- Fight Club and Daredevil both come to mind movie-wise and for TV John Barrowman on Doctor Who's 'Empty Child' and Joe Flannigan on SGA's 'Rising' are both wonderful. But then there's some that just come off as boring or as if you're missing a joke (like SGA's "38 Minutes") and then there's the OH NO WHY DID I WATCH THIS (seriously, never watch the commentary and BTS stuff for Highlander Raven, you will never see Elizabeth Gracen in the same light again).
Thoughts, anyone?
And, btw, a hearty welcome to anyone stopping by my journal for the first time, have a donut and enjoy your stay!

no subject
no subject
no subject
The Lord of the Rings commentaries are probably my favourites ever. They were the first DVDs I owned so the first commentaries I listened to and they are perfect. If you can get Bradly, Anthony and Colin on a Merlin commentary, it's wonderful. Katie is annoying. The SGA commentaries are usually good, but can veer into boring monotone, especially if some poor person has been left on their own to do it. The Sherlock ones are really great as well, though Russell Tovey is a bit of an ass on the Baskerville ep. Doctor Who has been good up until the newer series. It seems that only Karen likes to record them and she's too giggly for my tastes. I definitely prefer it when a member of the cast is on hand. The Firefly commentaries are also pretty awesome.
/rant
no subject
Do you find it weird when the commentary is done by someone who uses a different accent on the show/movie than in real life? I wonder if hearing Colin's Irish brogue would make listening to Merlin a bit odd or something.
no subject
I guess it would depend on how much you want to believe the actor is the character. It's a bit jarring to hear Colin being so Irish, but it doesn't' affect how I view him as the character, or anything. I just find him a bit hard to understand sometimes. Especially since he's quite mumbly on top of things. :D
no subject
good point re: colin. The mumbly aspect worries me though, I sometimes have problems understanding people then.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There is one and only one reason for this - the ones I've come across aren't subtitled. If you put a film/tv show on with the commentary track playing and have subtitles selected, it subtitles the film/show and NOT the commentary. As I rely on subtitles to hear what's being said on screen, never mind when there are people talking over it, I am left floundering and frustrated. A dvd commentary is not an enjoyable experience for me.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ETA: I think in all cases I've found commentary subtitles, it was through the audio menu while the movie was playing, not the main menu option. If you have some option with your remote to switch between audio and/or subtitle options, you could try looking through that,
no subject
I generally like best the ones that are informative, with behind the scenes info, and actors taking about what motivated them in a particular scene, or writers talking about the choices they made to get to a certain point. But I also like some humor mixed in. Like you said Fight Club is a great example of this.
As fun as they can be, I don't really lve commentaries where the cast is just having a giant party and not talking about what's going happening on-screen. I don't like it when people blather endlessly, but again, aren't actually talking about what's happening on-screen.
I usually don't love single person commentaries because a lot of those people can't fill the whole time and there's so much dead space. Rob Reiner has directed some of my favorite movies, and he's done comentaries for Stand By Me, The Princess Bride, A Few Good Men, and there's always so much dead air and things being repeated over and over. Thankfully, on the Stand By Me blu-ray released a couple of years ago he did a commentary with the actors that was better.
Stacey
no subject
Yeah, I've never really understood the point of the ones where all it is is a bunch of people blathering about with nothing to do with what's happening on the screen.
no subject
For me, hearing what the actors were thinking, or were trying to do, or what was going on in the background at the time, is much more interesting, as their perspective is much closer and more immediate. And funny, usually.
I remember one...I think it's an SGA commentary...where another member of the cast randomly wandered into the studio while they were talking, chipped in for a while, then wandered off again. It was fun, but it was also off-putting, because they completely lost the thread of the episode, so the images and the talking were completely unrelated. Definitely a mixed blessing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But yeah, the Empty Child one is good too. :-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Still a good film, though. Not as good as the series, imo, but it does kind of round some things up, and make sense of a few things.
no subject
no subject
That's Joss for you (and certain others who have tried to emulate him with less skill - yes RTD, I'm looking at you).
If you know what is going to happen, and to who, you can do the 'la la la I'm not listening/looking' bit at the relevant time and then you can immerse yourself in Denial.
It is a good film. Bearing in mind I'd not see any Firefly when Serenity first came out and the reason I picked up the dvd when I saw it cheap in ASDA in 2008 was because it had been recced by an author I liked (Mercedes Lackey). Then I decided after watching it that I really needed to see the series. I have since seen Serenity on a (biggish) screen 3 times, once travelling to London to do so - as part of the "Can't Stop the Serenity" movement that works with Equality Now - and adore Firefly.
There's a Firefly reunion convention in September this year with Kaylee and Simon as guests, I haven't got my ticket yet, but I will be there.
no subject