donutsweeper: (Default)
donutsweeper ([personal profile] donutsweeper) wrote2008-02-08 01:33 pm
Entry tags:

Since my flist knows everything...

What sort of computer tech would be able to fit on a big desk, but would be impressive?  The idea is that they think they're just dealing with someone barely into this technological age but they find the desk and it has so much stuff on it that they're nearly speechless.  Any ideas?  Does that even make sense?

[identity profile] k-haldane.livejournal.com 2008-02-08 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
He'd need better lighting and a decent ventilation system to take care of the waste heat. One other possible problem with old houses is the thickness of the walls, but if it's all in the same room that's not an issue.

Expect *lots* of little lights - red and green LEDs, some steady and some blinking to show activity. Lots of cables, but all neatly run down the backs of the desk and shelving units.

Tosh could say something like: "What is this guy doing!? He's got... well, this display is as good as mine, but that's a Linux box - no, the display is connected to this one - you know, these Macs are five thousand pounds each at the moment - so, ah! He's using the Linux box as a file server, and possibly firewall protection."

"What's this one for, then? Looks like an ordinary enough Windows machine to me."

"It is, but it's a good one. I guess he keeps it for compatability. That could get annoying, though, unless he's networked them all together."

"So he can browse the net from one, and do graphics work on another?"

"Exactly. And keep all the data files stored together so they're accessible from any of the machines, and print from all of them as well. That explains the cabling, but this must have taken years to get right. Every time you add a new component, you have to fine-tune the whole system again."

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2008-02-08 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
*passes donuts* Oh you are wonderful. This is exactly just the sort of help I needed to make the scene work.

[identity profile] k-haldane.livejournal.com 2008-02-08 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I look forward to seeing the end product. (quietly shuts door on room full of various computers at home.)

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2008-02-08 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
It's for my [livejournal.com profile] tardis_bigbang piece so it'll be awhile, but I'm actually beginning to think there's a hope in hell it'll actually get done. If you like I can post the techobabble snippet for you to give the once over as soon as I get it written.

So, does this work?

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2008-02-09 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
Red and green lights, some blinking and some not were scattered throughout the room. Cables snaked down the back of the desks and shelving units, gathering together as they made their way to the powerstrips on the floor.

“Oh, wow!” Tosh’s eyes grew wide as she took in the room’s splendor. “She’s got everything in here! That display is easily as good as the one’s we have back in the Hub, but wait, that's a Linux box - oh, I see, that display is connected to this machine here- hey, this is the system you said was too expensive for us to get! I bet she’s using the Linux box as a file server, and for firewall protection as well. Maggie must have spent a fortune on this equipment; there’s a regular windows machine for compatibility and the Linux for graphics sharing the same network so the data files are stored together. This is incredible!”

Re: So, does this work?

[identity profile] k-haldane.livejournal.com 2008-02-09 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Tiny niggles -

You need a big W on Windows (since it's a brand name).

No ' in "one's", that should just be "ones".

Also, I'm not sure what graphics software would run under Linux - I use a Mac for that sort of work. So my version would run "...a regular Windows machine for compatibility and a Mac for the graphics, sharing the same network..."

Otherwise it's pretty cool. : )

Re: So, does this work?

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2008-02-09 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
excellent, I made the corrections. Thanks so much!