donutsweeper (
donutsweeper) wrote2009-01-08 02:11 pm
Entry tags:
Babble on POVs
Just a question, and I'm not sure of the correct terminology here, but when reading (or writing), do you prefer a tight 3rd person POV (where all events are seen and interpreted through one character's eyes) or switching between people's 3rd person POV with obvious page breaks or markers to show the new POV?
For example- my entire Charming the Pants off the Pashahads SGA/Jack crossover is told from Sheppard's POV, there is no scene where we see what Jack thinks about falling into the Pegasus Galaxy. At points there are Sheppard's interpretation of Jack's actions (he notices a hedged answer, an avoided question, but doesn't know why Jack answered that way). If it had been written with switching POV's there could be the scene from Shep's perspective, noticing what he notices and wondering about it, followed by the same scene retold from Jack's, where he explained the reasons for saying what he did. There also could have been scenes left out from the story the way I told it- I never did explain how Jack managed to get his hands on the Pashahads (because Sheppard wasn't there and wouldn't know).
I've been noticing more and more of the latter showing up in stories lately. Presuming this babble actually makes sense to anyone, do you notice the difference between those types of POV styles and do you like one more than the other?
For example- my entire Charming the Pants off the Pashahads SGA/Jack crossover is told from Sheppard's POV, there is no scene where we see what Jack thinks about falling into the Pegasus Galaxy. At points there are Sheppard's interpretation of Jack's actions (he notices a hedged answer, an avoided question, but doesn't know why Jack answered that way). If it had been written with switching POV's there could be the scene from Shep's perspective, noticing what he notices and wondering about it, followed by the same scene retold from Jack's, where he explained the reasons for saying what he did. There also could have been scenes left out from the story the way I told it- I never did explain how Jack managed to get his hands on the Pashahads (because Sheppard wasn't there and wouldn't know).
I've been noticing more and more of the latter showing up in stories lately. Presuming this babble actually makes sense to anyone, do you notice the difference between those types of POV styles and do you like one more than the other?

no subject
no subject
I like (and most often write) tight 3rd person POVs. I just think they work best for me.
no subject
no subject
I've done 2nd person or twice. It's damn hard, but really works when done well
no subject
I switched, once, between 1st and 3rd (Battle Cry - SG1) and it was the only way to tell the story. There was also a time shift with the first person being in the 'present' (journal entries) and the 3rd being the actual story the journal entries were about. That's also the only story where I did both a gen version and a slash (no smut, sadly ;-) version. I can never really decide which version I like best. :-)
no subject
That actually sounds like a really good reason to switch POVs and tense, combining past/present events like that
no subject
It felt right at the time and it's still one of my favorite stories.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But I'm a sucker for ficlets too, just enough room to have a sceme play out
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Stick with Dresden 3rd person, I for one absolutely love it.
Nyah Nyah.
no subject
I need to reread canon I think. I can't hear the characters well enough anymore.
no subject
You know that makes me *so* mad. Concrit is all very well but to rip someone apart because their fic is from the 'wrong' POV? That STINKS *gnashes teeth*. I'm lucky I've manage to miss comments like that on the whole.
no subject
I don't let negative comments bother me. Or I try not to anyway
no subject
I think you just got one of those non-crossover purists who wanted to pick holes.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Makes me beam. :-)