It is one of those things I wonder about. Their avg age of viewer has gone up 2 years and is in the mid-40s if I remember (ideal is 18-35) and number are down.
So if it costs half as much to make you're saving $$ in the short run, but aren't you losing ad money? And will continue to lose it as the numbers drop further?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
So if it costs half as much to make you're saving $$ in the short run, but aren't you losing ad money? And will continue to lose it as the numbers drop further?