donutsweeper: (three- oh noes)
donutsweeper ([personal profile] donutsweeper) wrote2010-12-15 09:32 pm

(no subject)

I finally bite the bullet and quit freaking out over my Yuletide story and go to post it at AO3... only to find AO3 is down for maintenance. *grrrrr*

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, the sensible approach. I'm doing the random hmmm, what sounds weirdest? way of picking things to read

[identity profile] amythest-n-ice.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a huge 8/Fitz fan though, and after him will be any I can find with Adric (and I believe I may have spotted one at least), followed by any I can find with Turlough, after that it will be the random (and can you guess which companions I like best, lol). If you want weird, go for Infinity Race, I've never known a companion to get killed so many times in ONE book (and not even Captain Jack!).
Edited 2010-12-16 05:21 (UTC)

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't gotten into Eight yet, I'm trying though- I listened to a bit of Eight and Charley and Fitz is next on my list to delve into.

I'm a huge Turlough fan though, and Jamie. In general I've found the male companions are so much more interesting

[identity profile] amythest-n-ice.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
I think it isn't so much the male companions who are interesting, as their occasionally fairly obvious crushes on a certain Time Lord, so much funnier than the girls crushes.

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
excellent point. There's less chance of damsel-in-distress storylines too, which has never been a favorite of mine

[identity profile] amythest-n-ice.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I hear you! *grrrRosegrrr*

[identity profile] donutsweeper.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:27 am (UTC)(link)
Although, Turlough was chained up a lot, come to think of it...

[identity profile] amythest-n-ice.livejournal.com 2010-12-16 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
kinky!