donutsweeper (
donutsweeper) wrote2010-09-03 11:01 am
Entry tags:
What do you consider canon?
This poll is brought to you by the fact that the international version of the White Collar pilot contained scenes not in the American one...
[Poll #1614567]
[Poll #1614567]

no subject
no subject
I don't know if the scenes were cut for time, due to American censors or if Jess Easton did it for some reasoning of his own.
no subject
But I guess if the deleted scenes were aired somewhere, as opposed to just appearing in extras or on a blooper tape or whatever, then that would constitute canon after all.
So I'm now saying B but *only* if scenes are actually aired, even if you personally don't see them aired, and not just shown as extras on a DVD or something. I won't change my vote as I know that deleted can mean 'not shown on TV but only appear on DVD as extras' and to me that's not strictly canon - just as commentaries, etc. aren't canon, to my mind.
*Waves to you*
no subject
I'm torn about different versions airing in different places. I wonder WHY the scenes didn't air originally- it's possible the director took them out because they no longer jived with his/her vision of the show or something like that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I really need to get properly into White Collar, for it is awesome.
no subject
White Collar is AWESOME. And it's one of the few shows with strong women on now. Diana who's in the pilot and then S1 finale and S2 is GORGEOUS and amazing and fierce! And the show just rocks on so many other levels.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
For me, canon is what the creators say is canon. I don't put much stock in deleted scenes, since they were deleted for a reason. They were able to be cut because they weren't important enough to need to keep. They may be fun little facts to throw in, but they aren't strictly canon.
no subject
I don't put much stock in deleted scenes, since they were deleted for a reason. They were able to be cut because they weren't important enough to need to keep. They may be fun little facts to throw in, but they aren't strictly canon.
I like this way of looking at them, I agree with it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If forced at gunpoint to choose from among A-E, I would choose A. But I would say not just what's "originally" aired but the full extent of anything that is made and edited by the production team and aired, on television, somewhere. Sometimes they have to make heartbreaking edits for time or commercial interests, but when they get a bit more freedom, they'll do it closer to how they originally intended.
That said, "canon" is kind of a spectrum for me. In descending order of "unarguably canon" it's something like this for me:
1. What's aired on television
2. Writer & director commentary | Deleted scenes
3. Spinoff media created and written by the creative team of the TV show, especially while the show is still in production
4. Actor commentary
5. Official website materials (unless they contradict facts from the aired show & it's clear that the people putting together the website are not even running it by a continuity editor...)
6. Spinoff media written by others, but officially licensed
So basically, 2-6 I think are things that you can take into consideration, more or less strongly, in how you *interpret* canon, and then if you're writing fic... just use what's convenient, and explain in the notes where it came from so people can decide for themselves how close to canon they make it.
With Torchwood, there's *so* much history that wasn't explored on the aired show, if I want to delve into that history in a fic, I have a choice of making it all up myself, or researching what the website created and maybe what's in the official guide book thingy that was published. If I go with the latter, I'll feel like I'm at least closer to canon. But somebody else could argue that I'm not.
Oh! And of course, 'In Doctor Who, there's no such thing as canon.'
no subject
no subject
All in all, the line between Firefly canon and Firefly fanon is very blurry.
I think with the way episodic television is changing, F is a valid answer--whether it's just as valid for WC as for Firefly, I'm not sure, but it's a really interesting area of fannish speculation and I enjoyed thinking about it.
no subject
What's your opinion on what makes up Supernatural's canon? There were officially licensed comic books that went directly against show canon (one famously had John buying the Impala post-fire when the car is shown in the pilot with the family sitting on it watching the house burn)
I've also noticed that the longer ago a show ended, the more blurred the line between canon and fanon becomes.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
*runs to investigate*
I wrote all of the above in the survey because not every show/movie has the same ways of dispensing canon in addition to the show/movie itself.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
SO WHY AREN'T THESE ANYWHERE ON ANY US VERSION OF THE DVDS/ITUNES/ETC.
WTF, Jeff?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
So unless it actually appears on the screen...not so much.
And a chance to use my canon-schmanon icon.
no subject
*hee* Love the canon/schmanon!!
no subject
If you need privileged access (eg websites, or spending extra money for books) then it's not canon.
/personal opinion only of course.
no subject
no subject
(Sidenote: I don't feel qualified to answer the poll, not sure why. Maybe I need to go and watch all of S1 again)
ETA: I went back up the thread and saw where you'd linked to the deleted scenes. You guys missed some good stuff *feels sad for you*
no subject
So the longer version is the one that aired in England? Interesting, I'm surprised the scenes haven't shown up on youtube or whathaveyou then.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
For example, there's a deleted scene for the first Pirates of the Caribbean film that contradicts how Jack got his cursed gold coin in the original theater release. So, I wouldn't count *that* as canon, but I would count any other deleted scenes.
no subject
You "B" but.. idea makes a lot of sense.
no subject
no subject
I've looked EVERYWHERE and haven't seen neither hide nor hair of it. *Sigh*
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)