
Leon could still be kicking zombie ass in his 70s

On Friday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Right-Wing Nonsense banned the mailing of mifepristone, temporarily blocking a 2023 FDA policy that ended the requirement that the medication be prescribed and distributed in-person — even in states where abortion is legal. Misoprostol, a drug usually used in conjunction with Mifepristone, would still be allowed to be distributed in that way, and can induce an abortion on its own, but is not as safe or effective as the combination.
Luckily, after two companies that manufacture the pill challenged the ruling on Saturday, the Supreme Court has blocked it, temporarily allowing women to obtain the pill through pharmacies and the mail. Unfortunately, that order will only last until 5 p.m. on May 11, to allow them more time to consider the issue. It’s not great, but it’s something. For now.
At issue is the state of Louisiana’s belief that the FDA’s policy undermines its abortion ban and crushes its dreams of forcing women to have babies they don’t want, because women in their state have been able to obtain the pills through telehealth providers instead of just being shit out of luck. As damaging and dangerous as the overturning of Roe v. Wade has been, its impact has been heavily mitigated by the ability of women in abortion ban states to get mifepristone through the mail.
This will not be the first time the issue has been before the highest court in the land. In 2023, Texas judge (and religious right darling) Matthew Kacsmaryk tried to outlaw medication abortion, only to have his dreams dashed by SCOTUS, which found that the anti-abortion doctors and activists suing simply did not have standing to challenge the FDA’s policy. In its ruling, the Fifth Circuit found that Louisiana did have standing to sue on the grounds that its state Medicaid program covers emergency care for complications from the pill.
Of course, state Medicaid programs are required to cover all kinds of things that may be legal in one state but not in another, and it’s worth pointing out that mifepristone itself is not illegal in any state, but rather the use of it to induce an abortion. It is also used for several other purposes, including treating miscarriages, fibroids, during cancer biopsies, certain symptoms of Cushing’s Syndrome, endometriosis and more.
Mifepristone has been used safely for 25 years in the US, and since 1988 in France. It is several times safer than Viagra, which absolutely no one argues should only be prescribed in person and not distributed through the mail. There is no compelling health-related reason to require an in-person visit for mifepristone, whatsoever. The only reason, really, is means reduction — making it harder to get an abortion means women will have fewer of them, not just in abortion ban states but in all states. Not only is it just more convenient, but telehealth costs a lot less than traditional in-person visits.
The fact that it is legal to get this medication off the internet is why there has not been a substantial downturn in the actual number of abortions. In fact, data shows that more people are having abortions than they were before Roe was overturned, possibly due in part to the fact that they are a whole lot less excited to bring kids into a world in which women’s rights are being eroded.
Judges are not scientists. They are not doctors, and even if a judge did have a medical license because they were some kind of child prodigy who attended both law school and medical school, they would still not have any business regulating medications or how they are dispensed. Because that is not the job of a judge. That is not what they were appointed to do.
Want to donate to us but not to Substack? Click here or join our Patreon!
Similarly, it is the FDA’s job to create policies based on safety and efficacy, not on state laws or the personal moral stances and beliefs, supernatural and otherwise, of US conservatives, a fact that appears to confuse them in many ways, and not just as it relates to abortion medication. While they’re out here trying to claim that perfectly safe medications and treatments that have been in use for decades, but which they are morally opposed to — like mifepristone, birth control and many vaccines — are somehow unsafe, they’re also pushing for the FDA to deregulate things that actually are unsafe, like raw milk, or insufficiently tested, like the compounded peptides their right-wing podcast personalities like to use to get buff, or off-label uses of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
It’s hard to know what the Supreme Court will do here, since the majority are anti-abortion hardliners and cannot be trusted to rule fairly and objectively as far as that issue is concerned.
That being said, if they do decide in favor of Louisiana, it may very well be the beginning of the end of that majority, at least eventually. Republicans are already at a major disadvantage in the midterms, and such a ruling will certainly not help them very much. Voters across the United States have made it pretty damned clear that they don’t actually want abortion to be illegal and inaccessible. This is why lawmakers in Louisiana have worked so hard to prevent any statewide votes on the issue. Because despite the state’s conservative leanings, a slight majority — 53 percent — supports an amendment to the state’s constitution enshrining the right to abortion.
According to reports, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas are not planning to retire this year, but both are nearing that age. If Republicans lose the midterms, Donald Trump will not be able to nominate another conservative justice, and if Democrats win in 2028, they’d have to hold on to their seats for six more years from now — at least — in order to keep the ratio up.
PREVIOUSLY ON WONKETTE!


GameStop yesterday made an unsolicited offer to buy eBay for $55.5 billion. GameStop claims that eBay has underperformed and spends too much on sales and marketing and argues that it would become a stronger company if it cuts costs and is combined with GameStop's physical retail locations.
"GameStop’s ~1,600 US locations give eBay a national network for authentication, intake, fulfillment, and live commerce," GameStop Chairman and CEO Ryan Cohen wrote in a letter to eBay Chairman Paul Pressler.
eBay's market capitalization is over four times larger than GameStop's. GameStop faces skepticism about the viability of its offer but says it will obtain debt financing and pay with a mix of cash and stock.
After an unanticipated five-week break in the season, Formula One resumed action this past weekend in Miami. Held at a temporary circuit around Hard Rock Stadium, the event is emblematic of the Liberty era of F1: a turbocharged marketing extravaganza crammed full of hospitality suites with ticket prices as high as $95,000. It might be miles from the sea—the original plans to race across a bridge over Biscayne Bay did not survive contact with locals—but the sport is doing its best to make this a modern Monaco, playing up the host city's glamorous reputation and pastel color palette.
As we learned a couple of weeks ago, there have been tweaks to the amount of energy that the cars' new hybrid power units can regenerate and deploy via the electric motor that contributes almost half of the car's power output. The first three races of this season were frenetic, but they alarmed many longtime fans, as the cars are now too energy-limited to be driven flat-out during qualifying; that energy limitation also led to cars swapping positions multiple times, derisively dubbed "yo-yo" racing by critics.
The new limits on harvesting energy from the V6 to charge the battery on the move should reduce the potential for huge speed differentials like the one that caused Oliver Bearman's crash in Japan, and energy management was (thankfully) not much of a topic this weekend. Miami's layout definitely helps there, with plenty of braking zones to help regenerate much of the now-allowed 7 MJ each lap.

Watched ep. 1 of HeartCatch Precure.
Watched ep. 5 of 2.5-jigen no Ririsa.
Watched ep. 6 of Akatsuki no Yona!
Watched ep. 7 of Bikkurimen.
Watched ep. 1 of Gundam Build Fighters!


Last year, we noted how the long-standing vagaries of HDMI licensing and open source AMD driver development combined to prevent the upcoming Steam Machine from receiving official support for the HDMI 2.1 display standard. Now, though, it seems that AMD is making real progress on adding full HDMI 2.1 compliance to its Linux amdgpu driver in the near future.
In patch series notes for an amdgpu driver update posted on Friday (and noticed by Phoronix), AMD's Harry Wentland says that the company is finally adding HDMI FRL (Fixed Rate Link) support to the popular Linux display driver. That's the feature that allows for higher bandwidth on compatible HDMI cables compared to the TMDS standard found on HDMI 2.0 and earlier. That in turn enables direct support for higher resolutions, dynamic HDR, and features like Variable Refresh Rate that aren't supported in HDMI 2.0.
Wentland notes that this update is still just "a representative subset of HDMI compliance," in part because it is missing the code to support the Display Stream Compression (DSC) that allows for even higher resolutions and frame rates up to 10K at 100 Hz. But Wentland adds that DSC support "is still being tested and will be sent out later," and that "a full compliance run" for HDMI 2.1 is "in the works." An AMD driver developer with the handle agd5f also commented on Phoronix, noting that "a full implementation [of HDMI 2.1] will ultimately be available once the patches are ready and have completed compliance testing."

This weekend, Saturday May 9th, I’ll be in Greenwich Village in New York City with the Rainbow Book Fair! From noon to 6 pm we’ll be at The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Community Center on West 13th St., and there will be readings, panels, a queer poetry marathon, and a bilingual drag story hour. The Rainbow Book Fair is the largest and longest-running LGBTQIA+ book fair in the US, and I’m pretty damn excited to be going for the first time. I hope to see some of y’all there!


Todd Blanche, the (acting) attorney general, is (we guess) the best lawyer Trump’s money and reputation can afford.
And that explains a lot.
NBC’s Kristen Welker interviewed Blanche on Meet The Press and it did not go well.
Right off the bat, Blanche had a hard time doing his one true job for Trump: legally defending him personally, while persecuting/prosecuting his enemies.
WELKER: As you know, the War Powers Act requires Congress to authorize military action beyond 60 days. […] And yet, the U.S. is actively engaged in a naval blockade of Iranian ports as part of this conflict. Is the United States at war with Iran?
BLANCHE: No. I mean, what President Trump said this weekend is absolutely true. My job as the acting attorney general is to make sure that the president, that we all are doing the right thing legally.
Is it though? Because a naval blockade by its very nature is a military action. As Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said on ABC’s This Week: “The language of the statutes is — does not provide for timeouts like in a football game.”
Welker then played a clip of Trump working real hard not to say the “w”-word, as if that somehow is a loophole.
WELKER: Is the president effectively arguing that he can avoid congressional approval by avoiding using the word “war?”
BLANCHE: He’s not effectively arguing anything.
No argument there, Todd.
Welker then moved on to the worst thing involving seashells since the bathroom mystery in Demolition Man, the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. In 2025, Comey posted a picture on Instagram of the numbers “86 47” written out in seashells, and it caused the worst liars and idiots in human history to shriek that it was a threat on Donald Trump’s life. Fast forward 11 months and Trump has used the combined forces of his most loyal toadies to go after Comey for this “imminent” threat.
Welker, like all normal people, questioned the seriousness of this case based on the evidence, and Blanche did nothing to make it better.
WELKER:How does that image of seashells amount to a serious threat against the president's life?
BLANCHE: Well […] what you just showed is one part of that investigation. […] Rest assured that the career assistant United States attorneys in North Carolina, the career FBI agents, the career secret service agents that investigated this case didn’t just look at the Instagram post and walk away. […] I am not permitted to get into the details of what the grand jury heard or found, as you know. But rest assured that it’s not just the Instagram post that leads somebody to get indicted.
You guys have nothing, huh? Because if they did — like Jeanine Pirro on CNN’s State Of The Union this weekend, talking about the White House Correspondents’ Dinner suspect on Sunday — they’d tell us all about the evidence, instead pretending to play coy.
(Side note: Stop using the phrase “rest assured,” Todd!)
Prefer a non-Substack subscription? The button below will take any amount of your choosing at Paypal — let me know if you want the newsletter subscription too! they’re separate! — or we have a Patreon too.
Welker was still not convinced you could prove actual intent to harm Trump from James Comey’s bored wine mom Instagram post, and even cited noted conservative legal contrarian Jonathan Turley’s misgivings about the constitutionality and strength of this case.
She posed an obvious question:
WELKER: It is worth noting that on Amazon.com, we looked this up, there are dozens of products with the same terminology, we’re showing it right here, “86 47” being sold and purchased right now. Should individuals selling or buying “86 47” merchandise be concerned that they’re going to be prosecuted by the DOJ?
BLANCHE: This isn’t — this isn’t about a single incident, okay? I mean, of course not. That’s posted constantly. That phrase is used constantly. […] Every one of those statements do not result in indictments, of course.
Kinda undoes the main argument of the indictment, Todd.
Especially, as Welker pointed out, considering the evidence of this being a second attempt at a political prosecution of Comey, rather than a legal one:
WELKER: Back on September 20, President Trump publicly posted a private message to then Attorney General Pam Bondi pressuring her to prosecute Senator Adam Schiff, James Comey and Letitia James.
Blanche tried to argue, as others have done, that Trump being open and public about his intentions somehow blocks off charges that his actions are political or an illegal abuse of power.
When Welker asked why should people have confidence this case won’t be laughed out of court like all the other ones against Trump' critics, Blanche’s answer left a lot to be desired, if you are his boss:
BLANCHE: Well, let’s be accurate, okay? […] The federal judge dismissed that case because he found that the U.S. attorney was not properly appointed. That’s not a – there was no final finding on the facts or anything like that.
Oh, so a judge dismissing a case because they believe the prosecuting attorney was not properly appointed is not an exoneration nor a argument for the weakness of the case? Someone should build a time machine and go back to 2024 to let Judge Aileen Cannon know this.
Blanche’s most idiotic statement was reserved for his defense of voter supression attempts by the Trump administration.
Specifically, voter ID laws.
BLANCHE: Like every time you walk into a restaurant or a club, you have to show your ID, how about you have to show your ID to vote? That’s not — that’s not anything that’s crazy. And that’s what we should be talking about.
Unless you are eating at strip clubs or ordering alcoholic drinks at bar, IDs are fact-check not required to just walk in to a restaurant.
Have a week and a Happy Star Wars Day.
Follow Michael Mora on Threads, occasionally on Bluesky (and if you are still on Twitter, I’m also HERE).
You can subscribe to Michael Mora’s Substack, The Diasporican Writer, for additional thoughts and topics!